IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
 FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
 EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,       )
                                                )
                        Plaintiff.              )       CASE NO. 94 24 83
                                                )
                v.                              )       JUDGE LEINENWEBER
                                                )
 MICHAEL WILLIAMS,                       )
                                                )
                        Defendant.              )

SUPPLEMENT TO MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
 PRO SE APPELLANT

TO:     Mr. Thomas F. Strubbe                   Carol A. Davilo
        Clerk of the U.S. Court of Appeals              Assistant United States Attorney
        219 S. Dearborn, 20th Fl.                       219 S. Dearborn, 20th Fl.
        Chicago, IL   60604                             Chicago, IL   60604

        Juleann Hornyak                         SA Richard Loyd
        Clerk of the Supreme Court                      FBI - Room 905
        Supreme Court Building                  219 S. Dearborn
        Springfield, IL   62706                 Chicago, IL   60604

        William J. Stevens                              A.R.D.C.

        135 S. La Salle St.                             One Prudential Plaza

        Suite 1407                                      130 E. Randolph Drive

        Chicago, IL   60603                             Chicago, IL 60601-6219

        Boutros Boutros-Ghali                   J. Moller, Chief of Branch
        Secretary General                               Centre for Human Rights
        United Nations                          United Nations
        Room S-3800A                            Palais des Nations

        New York, NY   10014                    8 - 14 Avenue de la Paix
                                                        1211 Geneva 10

        Amnesty International                   United States Supreme Court
        Monbijoustrasse 26/Postfach                     1 First St., N.E.
        CH-3011 Bern                            Washington, D.C.
        Switzerland

        Albert Nortn                            Robert G. Clarke
        4725 Peachtree Corner Circle            7035 N. Clark St.
        Suite 375                                       Chicago, IL   60626
        Norcross, GA   30092

        Robert F. Bourne, Esq.                  Dr. A. Zumstein Schmid
        2550 Fifth Avenue                               Lerchenweg 18
        Suite 720                                       CH-3110 Muensingen
        San iego, CA   92103                    Switzerland

        Robert S. Meloni
        405 Park Ave.
        New York, NY   10022


        I, Michael Williams, declare that I am the Defendant-Appellant in the above- entitled proceeding. I am not an attorney, do not have the funds necessary to retain one,
 have not been appointed one despite my many persistent requests, and am thus being
 forced to prepare this motion myself, even though I am not qualified to do so.

1.      On 11. September 1995, Defendant-Appellant filed his MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME - PRO SE APPELLANT, seeking a reasonable amount of time
 to obtain private counsel to prepare an appellate brief which is due on 25. September 1995.

2.      On 30. August 1995, Defendant-Appellant filed his PETITION FOR MEMORANDUM OF FACTS AND LAW - PRO SE APPELLANT.

3.      Defendant-Appellant has not received a response from this Court to his MOTION
 FOR EXTENSION OF TIME - PRO SE APPELLANT, nor his PETITION FOR
 MEMORANDUM OF FACTS AND LAW - PRO SE APPELLANT.

4.      In a telephone conversation to the office of the Clerk of this Court today, 13.
 September 1995,  Defendant-Appellant was advised that his PETITION FOR MEMORANDUM OF FACTS AND LAW - PRO SE APPELLANT was docketed on 5.
 September 1995 and is still pending. He was further advised that his MOTION FOR

EXTENSION OF TIME - PRO SE APPELLANT has not yet been received.

5.      On 9. September 1995, Defendant-Appellant was contacted by attorney Albert Norton [4725 Peachtree Corner Circle, Suite 375, Norcross, GA   30092, Tel.: (404)
 446-2116] expressing an interest in representing him on his pending appeal. In his
 solicitation of his services, Mr. Norton wrote:

        "I am a former federal prosecutor (6th Cir.), and now am in private practice in
 Atlanta, GA (11th Cir.). I should be admitted in the 7th Cir. pro hac vice (for this one
 case) without any problem, but would have to travel for oral argument. I've done a lot of
 forfeiture cases, and have amassed considerable research to enable me to get up to speed
 quickly. Please give me a call at my office, (770) 446-2116, during usual e.s.t. business  hours, or at home (770) 734-9031. I can send you my c.v. if you like".

6.      On 11. September 1995, Defendant-Appellant transmitted to Mr. Norton via computer his volumes of files pertaining to this appeal.

- 2 -
 7.      On 11. September 1995, after Mr. Norton had received and reviewed Defendant- Appellant's files, Defendant-Appellant engaged in a lengthy international telephone
 conversation of approximately two hours with Mr. Norton. In this conversation, Mr.
 Norton pointed out additional violations of Defendant-Appellant's rights which had been
 violated and said he would be "delighted" to accept Defendant-Appellant's case and stated
 he would begin work on Defendant-Appellant's appellate brief immediately.

8.      On 11. September 1995, after speaking with Defendant-Appellant, Mr. Norton telephoned Defendant-Appellant's friend, attorney Robert F. Bourne, to discuss this case
 with him, since Mr. Bourne has closely followed this case since its inception on 18.
 March 1988.

        a.)     Defendant-Appellant's court-appointed attorney, William J. Stevens,
                entered into an agreement with Mr. Bourne immediately after his
                appointment to this case to notify Mr. Bourne of all legal action taken, and
                to not allow Defendant-Appellant to take any legal action without his first
                having the opportunity to discuss such action with Mr. Bourne.

                Mr. Stevens knowingly, willfully and falsely informed Defendant-
                Appellant on or about 11. August 1988 that he had just spoken with Mr.
                Bourne, and that Mr. Bourne had instructed him to plea guilty before Hon.
                George Marovich in order to visit his daughter, Shannon Elise Williams,
                on her death bed in George, where Defendant-Appellant had been falsely
                informed by Mr. Stevens was dying of spinal meningitis.

                Mr. Bourne denies such a conversation with Mr. Stevens ever took place.

9.      On 11. September 1995, at the conclusion of his telephone conversation with Mr.
 Bourne, Mr. Norton advised Mr. Bourne that he was going to accept Defendant-Appellant's case and file an appellate brief immediately.

10.     On 11. September 1995, Defendant-Appellant prepared a Notice for this Court,
 informing court that he was represented by Mr. Norton.

11.     On 12. September 1995, just before Defendant-Appellant posted said Notice to
 this Court, he received the following message from Mr. Norton:

- 3 -
        "Thank you for considering me, but I am not in a position to take your case. Based on what I have seen, you have a substantial chance of prevailing on the issue
 pending before the 7th Cir., but I caution you that you will lose if you do not file your
 brief by Sept. 25th, 1995. I wish you the best of luck. I hope you succeed."

12.     On 12. September 1995, immediately after receiving this shocking message from
 Mr. Norton, Defendant-Appellant telephoned Mr. Bourne to discuss it.

13.     On 12. September 1995, in said telephone conversation with Defendant-Appellant, Mr. Bourne advised Defendant-Appellant that he had spoken to Mr. Norton
 the previous day to explain the case to him, and that Mr. Norton had informed Mr.
 Bourne that he had informed Defendant-Appellant that he had agreed to accept his case; he
 further assured Mr. Bourne that he had accepted the case, that he would begin work
 immediately on the appellate brief, and would be journeying to Chicago for oral

arguments.

14.     On 12. September 1995, immediately after completing his telephone conversation
 with Mr. Bourne, Defendant-Appellant telephoned Mr. Norton, and, after engaging in
 another lengthy discussion with him, learnt that Mr. Norton had decided not to represent
 Defendant-Appellant due to his fear of the F.B.I.

15.     Numerous attorneys have cited their fear of the F.B.I. as their reason for electing
 not to represent Defendant-Appellant.

16.     Horror stories such as the Randy Weaver case fill the media today. Defendant-
 Appellant knows first-hand the terrorist tactics employed by the F.B.I.

17.     Mr. Norton's unethical behaviour has cost Defendant-Appellant dearly, has further prejudiced his case, and has made it virtually impossible for any attorney to have
 sufficient time to prepare an appellate brief.

18.     After Mr. Norton breached his agreement with Defendant-Appellant, Defendant-
 Appellant telephoned attorney Robert S. Meloni [405 Park Ave., New York, NY
 10022, Tel.: (212) 935-0900] to seek representation.

19.     Mr. Meloni informed Defendant-Appellant that before he could make a determination as to whether he would accept Defendant-Appellant's case or not, and on
 what terms he might accept it, he required:
 - 4 -
        a.)     The official court file to Defendant-Appellant's case;
        b.)     The attorney litigation file to Defendant-Appellant's case;
        c.)     The Affidavit of Merits of Defendant-Appellant's case (which Mr. Meloni
                stated should have been filed by attorney Robert G. Clarke)

20.     Defendant-Appellant informed Mr. Meloni that his previous attorneys, William J.
 Stevens and Robert G. Clarke, as well as H. Stuart Cunningham, Clerk of the U.S.
 District Court and Thomas F. Strubbe, Clerk of the U.S. Court of Appeals, have ignored
 Defendant-Appellant's demands for said files.

21.     Defendant-Appellant also informed Mr. Meloni that his demands to Mr. Clarke for
 a copy of the government's answer to his response in the U.S. District Court have been
 ignored, and that this Court has denied as "frivolous" his motion to order a copy of said
 answer to be supplied to him.

22.     Mr. Meloni also informed Defendant-Appellant that Mr. Clarke should have, (as
 he agreed to do when he accepted this case), taken depositions from all of the F.B.I.
 agents who participated in the unlawful seizure of Defendant-Appellant's property.

23.     Mr. Meloni also informed Defendant-Appellant that he requires copies of purchase
 receipts indicating Defendant-Appellant as the legal owner of the significant property
 which was unlawfully seized by the F.B.I. so that he may amend Defendant-Appellant's
 appeal to include the other significant property unlawfully seized by the F.B.I. which the
 F.B.I. is attempting to hide from the Court in order to avoid returning said property and
 to protect those agents involved from certain criminal prosecution and loss of their positions.

24.     Defendant-Appellant advised Mr. Meloni that he had filed a motion in this Court
 requesting an order to subpoena said receipts, which had also been unlawfully seized by
 the F.B.I., and that said motion had been denied as "frivolous".

25.     Mr. Meloni also advised Defendant-Appellant that his ex-wife's participation in
 this appeal is necessary, particularly due to the fact that she was an eyewitness to the
 unlawful seizure.

26.     With the encouragement and assistance of the F.B.I., United States Probation
 Department, and others, known and unknown, within the United States government,

- 5 -
 Defendant-Appellant's ex-wife obtained an unlawful divorce from him, kidnapped both
 of their minor children, and is now "underground" with the children.

27.     Defendant-Appellant requires time and resources to locate his ex-wife for her
 testimony, which is crucial to this appeal.

28.     To deprive Defendant-Appellant sufficient time to locate his ex-wife would be to
 deny him his constitutional right to Due Process of Law and would seriously prejudice
 his appeal for the return of his unlawfully seized property.

29.     Defendant-Appellant's right to counsel is being further violated by his previous
 attorneys and this Court's refusal to provide him with documents which are essential to
 his obtaining private counsel.

30.     As Defendant-Appellant has pointed out to this Court on numerous occasions, he
 is totally unqualified to prepare an appellate brief.

31.     Defendant-Appellant's doctor has notified the Court that forcing him to attempt to
 prepare an appellate brief, which he is totally unqualified to do, places his life in danger,
 due to his medical condition, brought on by years of torture at the hands of the F.B.I.,
 U.S. Bureau of Prisons, and others within the U.S. government.

32.     Defendant can not and will not attempt to prepare an appellate brief.

33.     In order to obtain private counsel of his choice, defendant requires the documentation listed in this supplement, to wit:

                a.)     The official court file to Defendant-Appellant's case;
                b.)     The attorney litigation file to Defendant-Appellant's case;
                c.)     The Affidavit of Merits of Defendant-Appellant's case;
                d.)     Copies of purchase receipts indicating Defendant-Appellant as the
                        legal owner of the significant property which was unlawfully
                        seized by the F.B.I.





- 6 -
        WHEREAS, Defendant-Appellant Michael Williams prays that this Court will stop the clock, or, in the alternative, grant a reasonable extension of time so that he may obtain
 said documentation and obtain private counsel of his choice, as directed by Amendment
 VI, United States Constitution.


                                                Respectfully submitted,





                                                MICHAEL WILLIAMS, in Pro Se
                                                Postfach 20
                                                CH-3112 Allmendingen bei Bern
                                                Switzerland



- 7 -
 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING

CANTON OF BERNE                 )
                                                )
 COUNTRY OF SWITZERLAND  )

MICHAEL WILLIAMS swears that on the 13. September 1995, he placed a copy
 of SUPPLEMENT TO MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME - PRO SE APPELLANT
 in envelopes addressed to the following named individuals and caused the envelopes to be
 deposited in the Swiss mail depository located at the PTT Post Office in Muensingen,
 Switzerland on said date at or before the hour of 5:00 p.m.

        Mr. Thomas F. Stubbe                    Carol A. Davilo
        Clerk of the U.S. Court of Appeals              Assistant United States Attorney
        219 S. Dearborn, 20th Fl.                       219 S. Dearborn, 20th Fl.
        Chicago, IL   60604                             Chicago, IL   60604

        Juleann Hornyak                         SA Richard Loyd
        Clerk of the Supreme Court                      FBI - Room 905
        Supreme Court Building                  219 S. Dearborn
        Springfield, IL   62706                 Chicago, IL   60604

        William J. Stevens                              A.R.D.C.

        135 S. La Salle St.                             One Prudential Plaza

        Suite 1407                                      130 E. Randolph Drive

        Chicago, IL   60603                             Chicago, IL 60601-6219

        Boutros Boutros-Ghali                   J. Moller, Chief of Branch
        Secretary General                               Centre for Human Rights
        United Nations                          United Nations
        Room S-3800A                            Palais des Nations

        New York, NY   10014                    8 - 14 Avenue de la Paix
                                                        1211 Geneva 10

        Amnesty International                   United States Supreme Court
        Monbijoustrasse 26/Postfach                     1 First St., N.E.
        CH-3011 Bern                            Washington, D.C.
        Switzerland

        Albert Norton                           Robert G. Clarke
        4725 Peachtree Corner Circle            7035 N. Clark St.
        Suite 375                                       Chicago, IL  60626
        Norcross, GA   30092

        Robert F. Bourne, Esq.                  Dr. A. Zumstein Schmid
        2550 Fifth Avenue                               Lerchenweg 18
        Suite 720                                       CH-3110 Muensingen
        San Diego, CA   92103                   Switzerland

        Robert S. Meloni
        405 Park Ave.
        NewYork, NY   10022
 - 8 -


                                                Respectfully submitted,





                                                MICHAEL WILLIAMS, in Pro Se
                                                Postfach 20
                                                CH-3112 Allmendingen bei Bern
                                                Switzerland